Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2005-03-22 05:44:02
Size: 1368
Editor: anonymous
Comment: missing edit-log entry for this revision
Revision 2 as of 2009-09-20 23:50:19
Size: 1369
Editor: localhost
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 19: Line 19:
There is another open source framework called [http://www.keelframework.org  Keel] that is based on Avalon. We might want to take a look at how they implement things like security... There is another open source framework called [[http://www.keelframework.org|Keel]] that is based on Avalon. We might want to take a look at how they implement things like security...

Navigation trail: TurbineProjectPages - JakartaTurbine2 - [JakartaTurbine2/Development|Development]


Development of Turbine 2.X

[wiki:/CurrentStatus CurrentStatus]
Current project status
[wiki:/DevelopmentRoadMap Road Map]
Development road map
[wiki:/DocumentationRoadMap Road Map]
Documentation road map
[wiki:/VelocityOnlyLayout Converting from ["VelocityECSLayout"] to VelocityOnlyLayout]
Steps to convert your application
[wiki:/PageLayout Recursive layouts]
A Page type layout and/or the ability to embed layouts recursively.
[wiki:TurbineAvalonization Moving to Avalon components]
The plan to implement Avalon lifecycle interfaces
[wiki:TurbineCodingStandards Revised coding standards]
Proposal for updated coding standards

New idea for intake - http://sourceforge.net/projects/formproc/

<em>FormProc seems to be a much more clean solution than Intake. However it lacks ability for automatic mapping to torque-generated business objects, which is a critical feature.<br>Marc</em> <em>What about commons-validator? And couldn't we add the mapping to formproc?<br>EricPugh</em>

There is another open source framework called Keel that is based on Avalon. We might want to take a look at how they implement things like security...


CategoryJakartaTurbine2

JakartaTurbine2/Development (last edited 2009-09-20 23:50:19 by localhost)