Differences between revisions 2 and 3
Revision 2 as of 2006-10-07 11:22:05
Size: 1042
Revision 3 as of 2009-09-20 22:58:17
Size: 1044
Editor: localhost
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 26: Line 26:
 * My [:/OSGi/KnopflerfishTryOut: first steps] with Knopflerfish
 * The [:/OSGi/ConfigurationAdmin: ConfigurationAdmin]
 * My [[/OSGi/KnopflerfishTryOut| first steps]] with Knopflerfish
 * The [[/OSGi/ConfigurationAdmin| ConfigurationAdmin]]

There have been several discussions in the past about searching for an alternative for Avalon/Phoenix. The main reason might be that the Avalon project has closed.


I find it difficult to name the things all that fancy framework do. And It seems the developers of that frameworks don't seem to have a consistent naming either. So what is OSGi? A platform? A microkernel? And Phoenix? And Avalon? A container? So we should define it here.

Current Architecture

To be able to discuss switching the framework we need a summery what is currently used and how.

  • Phoenix
  • Avalon
  • Cornerstone

The Alternatives

The first thing to to talk about would be the platform/microkernel the application runs in because that might limit the possibilities for the integration of additional frameworks.



  • Plexus

Development/ReplacePhoenix (last edited 2009-09-20 22:58:17 by localhost)