Differences between revisions 13 and 14
Revision 13 as of 2008-07-16 15:49:45
Size: 918
Editor: geechorama
Comment:
Revision 14 as of 2009-09-20 23:47:14
Size: 918
Editor: localhost
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 9: Line 9:
bryanduxbury (or the one immediately above this[[BR]] bryanduxbury (or the one immediately above this<<BR>>
Line 18: Line 18:
dreiss[[BR]]
kclark -- I've been using "Fix a bug. [THRIFT-99]" for my last several hundred commits fwiw, and have also been prefixing with the language being patched (eg. rb:)[[BR]]
mcslee[[BR]]
mgreene[[BR]]
dreiss<<BR>>
kclark -- I've been using "Fix a bug. [THRIFT-99]" for my last several hundred commits fwiw, and have also been prefixing with the language being patched (eg. rb:)<<BR>>
mcslee<<BR>>
mgreene<<BR>>

Vote on it!

(THRIFT-99) Fix a bug.

[THRIFT-99] Fix a bug.

todd

THRIFT-99. Fix a bug.

bryanduxbury (or the one immediately above this
dougcutting -- This is what all the other Apache projects I'm involved with use. It also adds fewer characters w/o sacrificing readability.

Fix a bug. (THRIFT-99)

Fix a bug. [THRIFT-99]

kballard -- like kclark, I have been using "lang: Fix a bug. [THRIFT-99]". I believe this is in order of importance of the components.

I don't care as long as we are consistent.

dreiss
kclark -- I've been using "Fix a bug. [THRIFT-99]" for my last several hundred commits fwiw, and have also been prefixing with the language being patched (eg. rb:)
mcslee
mgreene
geechorama

I don't care as long as we are INconsistent so I can figure out who committed the patch without looking at the log.

CommitStyleVote (last edited 2009-09-20 23:47:14 by localhost)