Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: [Original edit by Mukul] reverting the description of this page to what it was originally

...

Vendor

Total Tests

Tests passed

Success %

Detailed Reports

IBM

919

919

100

%3Clink%3E

Saxonica

1314

1311

99.77

%3Clink%3E

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="48916455-a1bc-4ea1-ad7a-98a855381364"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

Oracle [*]

26

26

100

[%3Clink%3E

xmlschema11OracleTests]

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="25101a9d-423a-4894-a082-f182f8b34bce"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

Microsoft [*]

80

73

91.25

[%3Clink%3Exmlschema11MSTests]

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="60833878-7ae8-4262-9765-d05040816f02"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

Sun Microsystems [*]

6

6

100

[%3Clink%3E

xmlschema11SunTests]

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

WG

28

28

100

%3Clink%3E

Wiki Markup
  Note: As per the discussions during W3C XML Schema 1.1 standards process, the vendor names in this table annotated with \[\*\] did not had direct contributions / influence to the XML Schema 1.1 test suite. The XML Schema 1.1 tests of these vendors as reflected in this table, are there because, those tests were committed officially to the W3C XML Schema WG (either as minor modifications to earlier XML Schema 1.0 tests to make them 1.1 tests, or very few new XML Schema 1.1 tests), but it is not sure to the Xerces-J team the official status of the contributions of those tests. The readers of this page are therefore made aware of this fact.

...

  • Overall Test Suite run status:*

    Total Tests

    Tests passed

    Success %

    2373

    2363

    99.57