October 30, 2014 How to patch the HCFS tests.

Below, we've detailed how to add or update the semantics of a test.

Over time, however, we also need to maintain the HCFS tests. Heres a quick way to confirm the behaviour of a test on hadoop trunk, in case you want to know that the test "actually works", before you blame your hadoop connector :)

mvn test -Dtest=org.apache.hadoop.fs.contract.rawlocal.TestRawlocalContractAppend

The above line will test the TestRawLocalContractAppend case. Since that test may or may not be skipped depending on your configuration, you may need to temporarily comment out the skipIfUnsupported line in setup().

September 2, 2014 How to update the HCFS contract and test classes as the FileSystem evolves.

When we define new file system behaviours, its critical to update the contract documentation and tests. However, its not particularly difficult to do this,

the HCFS contracts only consist of:

  1. Unit tests which are extended for file systems, annotated with fields from
  2. XML files which define a filesystem's semantics
  3. A series of .md files, which define a semi formal specification.

The steps to extend any FileSystem semantics are now quite simple, and explicit.

1) Check out the guide here, and update the .md contract files.

2) Update the existing unit tests (test/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/contract/) where relevant.

For an example of how to use the HCFS contract tests in a file system implementation, read below.

July 14, 2014 Hadoop FileSystem and FileContext work, largely concluded.

With https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9361, we are now able to test hadoop FileSystems in an unambiguous and declarative manner, using a combination of:

* An XML File to define FileSystem semantics. This file needs to be loaded in your unit tests. The contract will define the semantics of your file system, and the unit tests will then test based on the parameters you define. For example,


* The standard contract test super classes bundled into Hadoop. These are built in the hadoop common tests jar (hadoop-common-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar).

* Adding custom classes to override each of the above super classes. To do this, you manually create classes extending from the super classes in the hadoop tests jar, like so:

 public class TestMyHCFSBaseContract extends AbstractFSContract
 public class TestMyHCFSCreateTests extends AbstractContractCreateTest
 public class TestMyHCFSFSContractDelete extends AbstractContractDelete
 public class TestMyHCFSContractLoaded extends AbstractFSContractLoaded
 public class TestMyHCFSContractMkdir extends AbstractContractMkdir
 public class TestMyHCFSContractOpen extends AbstractContractOpenTest

And so on (all the classes which you can overide are in org.apache.hadoop.fs.contract., and you can scan the existing hadoop source code for examples of how to properly override them.

The completion of this coherent and flexible test framework allows us to expand upon and customize hadoop file system work. To extend the contract tests, or add new semantics, there is a clear path : The .md files, which exist inside of existing hadoop-common source code. See the src/site/markdown/filesystem/.... files to do so. These can easily be browsed here:


Thanks to Steve Loughran and other 9361 reviewers for this critical and timely update to the hadoop contract tests. This democratizes storage underneath hadoop and enables continued co-evolution of storage and YARN computation, hand in hand.

Hadoop FileSystem and FileContext Workstream (2014)

In order to begin iterating on improving HCFS test coverage we need an unambiguous mechanism for implementing HCFS tests. After implementing HCFS tests, we want to compare test coverage with a gold-standard, and finally, where any gaps exist we want to be able to justify them using simplest semantics possible, ideally in code. The below three JIRAs address these 3 issues. Once they are completed, HCFS testing will be much simpler.

* HADOOP-9361: A programmatic way for FS implementations to broadcast the features they support, so that all file systems can reuse the same basic test libraries without needing to do ad-hoc overriding of certain implementations.

* HADOOP-10463: Boosting RawLocalFileSystem test coverage and

* HADOOP-10461: Creating an injection framework for any HCFS to plug into, which supports: (feed back pending from OrangeFS Community and others).

* BIGTOP-1089: Scale testing as a universal HCFS integration test, confirming that the whole ecosystem works together on FS interface level. (Scale testing / updateing to 50 input splits pending from OrangeFS community).

In another thread, we will work to improve coverage of RawLocalFileSystem (LocalFs/LocalFileSystem)

Hadoop FileSystem Validation Workstream (2013)

Hadoop has a pluggable FileSystem Architecture. 3rd party FileSystems can be enabled for Hadoop by developing a plugin that mediates between the Hadoop FileSystem Interface and the interface of the 3rd Party FileSystem. For those developing a Hadoop FileSystem plugin, there is no comprehensive test library to validate that their plugin creates a Hadoop FileSystem implementation that is Hadoop compatible.

What do we mean by comprehensive? We mean that there is a test for every single operation in the FS Interface that properly tests the expected behavior of the operation given the full variability of its parameters. To create a comprehensive test library, we plan to do the following:

* Focus on the Hadoop 2.0 FS Interface. If possible, create a work stream that would allow testing and validation of the FS 1.0 Interface also.

* Undertake an audit of the Hadoop FileSystem 1.0 Test Coverage - Link to Work In Progress

* Undertake an audit of the Hadoop FileSystem 2.0 Test Coverage - Link to Work In Progress

* Document the FileSystem 2.0 Specification (as a JavaDoc) as a JIRA Ticket

* Create a gap analysis contrasting the FileSystem 2.0 Specification and the audits of existing FileSystem 2.0 Test Coverage.

* Create tests to fill in the gaps

Once the comprehensive test library is complete, it can then be used by the provider of a 3rd Party FileSystem to verify compatibility with Hadoop by:

Next Meeting

June 25th 2013 - Face to Face meeting at Red Hat in Mountain View. The day before Hadoop Summit. Details/Sign up here - http://hadoop-fs.eventbrite.com/

Work thus far

June 10th 2013 9AM PST via Google Hangout

Attendees: Tim St. Clair, Matt Farrellee, Steve Watt, Jay Vyas, Steve Loughran, Sanjay Radia, Andrew Purtell, Joe Buck, Roman Shaposhnik, Nathan (?)


- Discussion of the goals of the work

- Steve Loughran to give an update on the Hadoop FS Tests he developed for SWIFT

- Discussion on where people would like to participate


- Validation of the current goals, plus the addition of:

The workstream definition at the top of this page has been updated to reflect the new additions to the initiative.

June 4th 2013

Created a diff report contrasting Hadoop FileSystem 1.0 and 2.0

Next step is to evaluate how comprehensive the unit test case coverage is for FileSystem 1.0 and 2.0. This is a work in progress Audit of the FileSystem 1.0 Test Library

May 23rd 2013 - A broader call for participation was made to the hadoop-core dev proposing:

* broader participation in defining the expected behavior of Hadoop FileSystem operations

* creating a comprehensive test suite verifying compliance with the expected behavior of a Hadoop FileSystem

* several google hangouts and a workshop to discuss the topics

The following parties responded that they were interested in participation: - mbhandarkar@gopivotal.com , shv.hadoop@gmail.com , stevel@hortonworks.com , erlv5241@gmail.com , shaposhnik@gmail.com , apurtell@apache.org , cdouglas@apache.org , jayhawk@cs.ucsc.edu , sanjay@hortonworks.com , dmitry.bimatov@isilon.com

HCFS/Progress (last edited 2014-10-30 14:35:23 by 66)